Articles carbon 14 dating
Radiometric Dating Technologies are presented to the public by evolutionists as utterly reliable clocks for dating earth rocks or biological materials.There are more than 80 such technologies that are claimed to work.The main criticism of the method is in the ration of Carbon-14 to Carbon-12. Libby initially assumed that the ratio was in equilibrium..equal amount of C-14 was entering the earth's system as were being eliminated. Since C-12 is converted to C-14 by cosmic radiation, and there is a lot more C-12 in the atmosphere, then there is a lot more C-12 to be hit by cosmic radiation, and thus, converted to C-14.In order to accurately date an item, one must know the ratio at the time of the organism's death. When Libby looked for evidence of this, he discovered that C-14 was being added at a rate that was 12-20 percent faster than it was being eliminated. Prior to the industrial revolution, we have every reason to believe that the ratio was at a state of equilibrium.They want to know if it is accurate or if it works at all.Worse still, sometimes they want to know how evolutionists use Carbon-14 to date dinosaur fossils!Then, in another 5,730 years, a second decay period would occur, leaving one quarter of a pound.The process would continue, halving the amount left every 5,730 years until, theoretically, nothing remained of the original pound.
There is then a ratio of Carbon-14 to Carbon-12 in the bodies of plants, animals and humans which could be considered as fixed at the time of death.
The other factor is the decay of the earth's magnetic field.
This topic has been thoroughly refuted by science, and it does not need discussion either.
By knowing the ratios in items of known age, a calibration curve was started, which today has many more data points.
Finally, Wieland mentions two other factors that must be considered.