No dating policy for employees Camerachat se
So, while non-fraternization policies may cause some gray areas to surface within a company, the good news is that when challenged, they are being upheld. A broad non-fraternization policy may constitute as interfering with employee rights to engaged in concerted activity, protected by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) – a BIG NO-NO.
Looking deeper however, interpretation of these statutes is narrow when it comes to office romances, failing to recognize a romantic activity as a “protected recreational activity”.
Non-Fraternization Policies and the Law Traditionally, a company policy is designed to keep the balance of power between employees (as individuals) and the company as a whole – defining good versus bad conduct and consequences that are associated with the bad. In the case of two California Department of Corrections employees working at a prison where the warden was having an affair with three other employees – not so good. The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs causing companies even more reason to be concerned about workplace relationships – even when consensual.
But, can policies apply to conduct outside of work such as with romantic relationships? Although all employees engaged in the “relationship” were consenting individuals, the situation still resulted in a sexual harassment suit. How about the fact that no sexual advances or harassing comments had ever been made to either plaintiff? But with all the studies on workplace camaraderie and positive correlation with employee engagement, there has to be some benefit to employees liking each other enough to date, right?
If it did go well, and one of you got promoted over the other, how would that impact things?Heather Huhman, a workplace expert and the founder and president of Come Recommended, says that regardless of what policies you put into place, employees need to be involved from the beginning.Even if there is no official set of rules, Huhman says if the situation does arise, it is on the individual to think about the ramifications of a workplace relationship.Google provides regular training to executives in order to best address the topic.As of 2013, the company updated its policies to require all vice presidents and above to disclose any inter-office relationships that might have a conflict of interest attached to the company’s general counsel and People Operations department.But in the wake of the #Me Too movement and sexual harassment allegations that have come to light across multiple industries over the past several months, it's on every company to assess whether their HR policies in this arena make it possible for everyone to feel safe at work. According to a Google spokesperson, the company strongly discourages employees from involving themselves in relationships with colleagues that they manage or report to, or if there is any question whether one individual has power over the other.The search giant has moved employees to different roles in the event that the latter does occur.It shouldn't just be up to one person to make that decision.Recently, Culture Engineered was asked by the Huffington Post how an employee should ask a co-worker out on a date. These rulings have not been so favorable for employers (ie ).You may also want to prohibit inter-department dating to avoid conflict.No, you don’t have the right to tell two of your employees who are in a relationship that they can’t express PDA (public displays of affection) outside of work hours.